Arrow-EFM

Highly efficient carbon-dot-based photoinitiating systems for 3D-VAT printing

Known as a rising star among carbon nanomaterials, carbon dots (CDs) have attracted considerable interest in various fields in recent years.*

In the article “Highly efficient carbon dot-based photoinitiating systems for 3D-VAT printing” Dominika Krok, Wiktoria Tomal, Alexander J. Knight, Alexander I. Tartakovskii, Nicholas T. H. Farr, Wiktor Kasprzyk and Joanna Ortyl describe how they synthesized different types of carbon dots (CDs) based on citric acid as a precursor using an efficient procedure to purify these materials from low molecular by-products and fluorophores.*

They introduce three types of CDs: citric acid-based, as well as ammonia- and ethylenediamine-doped CDs, and compare their effectiveness to commercially available graphene-based CDs as an element of two- or three-component photoinitiating systems dedicated for free radical photopolymerization processes.*

This approach led to the development of efficient initiating systems and allowed better understanding of the mechanism according to which CDs performed in these processes. *

As the proof of concept, CDs-based photoinitiating systems were implemented in two types of 3D-VAT printing processes: DLP and DLW printing, to obtain high-resolution, 3D hydrogel materials. *

Dominika Krok et al. believe that the research presented in their article will become the basis for further work on carbon dots in the context of the diverse use of photopolymerization processes and avoid errors affecting the misinterpretation of data. *

The morphology and chemical composition of obtained hydrogel printouts were profoundly characterized via scanning electron microscopy (SEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), nanoscale Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (Nano-FTIR), and scattering-type Scanning Near-field Optical Microscopy (s-SNOM). *

The s-SNOM system used to collect the data shown in figure 12 of the article cited below, consisted of an AFM within one arm of an interferometer, and a moveable mirror in the other. *

A conductive platinum-iridium coated NanoWorld ARROW-EFM AFM probe was brought into tapping mode operation upon the sample (tapping frequency 77 kHz, tapping amplitude 71 nm), and illumination from a single-wavelength source outputting at 1490 cm−1 was sent into the interferometer. *

Under focused illumination, the conductive AFM tip acts as an optical antenna and a near field is generated at the AFM tip apex (AFM tip radius around 25 nm). The near field interacts with the sample surface and forms a scattering centre that scatters further incoming photons. *

The scattered photons were collected at the detector and interfered with photons returning from the movable mirror in the reference arm of the interferometer. This reference mirror was oscillated in order to induce side-band frequency mixing in the optical signal power spectrum, and the optical amplitude and phase data were extracted at the third harmonic of the AFM tapping frequency. *

The optical amplitude data were normalised to the maximum recorded value. The optical phase data were left unprocessed, and thus the raw values of the phase data in Fig. 12 (cited below) do not hold physical meaning. Only the contrast between two areas of Fig. 12 should be considered. *

AFM data: AFM topology data were recorded using the same instrument as used for the s-SNOM measurements. Conductive AFM cantilevers (Pt/Ir coated ARROW-EFM AFM probes from NanoWorld) were used, at a tapping frequency of 77 kHz and a tapping amplitude of 71 nm. *

Further surface characterization of the hydrogel samples performed with AFM and s-SNOM techniques revealed that, occasionally, carbon dot particles can be found at or emerging from the surface of the hydrogel. *

Fig. 12D presents the surface topography of an 8 μm by 6.8 μm region of hydrogel as measured through AFM, which is in keeping with the surface characterization data presented in Fig. 12A–C. It is not obvious from the topography data in Fig. 12D alone which features of the sample surface relate to carbon material. *

However, the carbon dot particles can be identified through the mechanical properties of their surface: Fig. 15E in the cited article presents the AFM phase data from the scan shown in Fig. 12D, with AFM phase being sensitive to various mechanical surface properties of the sample material such as hardness and adhesion. *

A strong phase contrast is observed between the soft hydrogel and the harder carbon dot material, allowing for the identification of a carbon dot particle that is only partially covered by the hydrogel. *

Additionally, Fig. 12F presents s-SNOM optical phase data taken during the scan shown in Fig. 12D, using illumination at 1490 cm−1. s-SNOM measurements are sensitive to optical properties such as refractive index and absorption, and the differences in these properties between the hydrogel and carbon dot materials creates strong contrast in s-SNOM phase data, allowing for further verification of the location of the carbon dot particle. *

Dominika Krok et al. note that often large areas of the hydrogel surface had to be scanned before any carbon dot particles partially above the surface were identified, and that no carbon dot particles were found either entirely or mostly above the surface of the hydrogel. *

It is therefore assumed that the CDs embedded within the 3D-VAT prints do not congregate on the surface of the material but instead are distributed throughout the matrix. *

Fig. 12 from “Highly efficient carbon dot-based photoinitiating systems for 3D-VAT printing” by Dominika Krok et al. (2023):(A) Low magnification secondary electron (SE) image of a 3D-VAT printout taken using an Everhart–Thornley Detector (ETD). (B) High resolution SE image of a 3D-VAT printout taken using a Through Lens Detector (TLD). (C) Backscattered election (BSE) image taken using a concentric backscatter (CBS) detector. (D): AFM height topography of a carbon dot at the surface of a hydrogel sample. (E) AFM mechanical phase data taken simultaneously with the data in (D). AFM phase data is sensitive to a number of surface properties (hardness, adhesion, etc.) and is often difficult to interpret. In this case, we simply note that the AFM phase contrast observed in (E) allows for easy distinction between areas of the hydrogel (high AFM phase) and the carbon dot surface (low AFM phase). (F): s-SNOM phase data taken simultaneously with the data in (D), with incident illumination at 1490 cm−1. The s-SNOM data was demodulated at the 3rd harmonic of the AFM tapping frequency to reduce the influence of background effects. The hydrogel and the carbon dot particle have different optical responses under the incident illumination, and so s-SNOM phase contrast is observed between the different regions of the AFM scan. Corresponding s-SNOM amplitude data is shown in Fig. S22 of the ESI.† The s-SNOM system used to collect the data shown in this figure consisted of an AFM within one arm of an interferometer, and a moveable mirror in the other. * A conductive platinum-iridium coated NanoWorld ARROW-EFM AFM probe was brought into tapping mode operation upon the sample (tapping frequency 77 kHz, tapping amplitude 71 nm), and illumination from a single-wavelength source outputting at 1490 cm−1 was sent into the interferometer. * — Fig. 12 from “Highly efficient carbon dot-based photoinitiating systems for 3D-VAT printing” by Dominika Krok et al. (2023):
(A) Low magnification secondary electron (SE) image of a 3D-VAT printout taken using an Everhart–Thornley Detector (ETD). (B) High resolution SE image of a 3D-VAT printout taken using a Through Lens Detector (TLD). (C) Backscattered election (BSE) image taken using a concentric backscatter (CBS) detector. (D): AFM height topography of a carbon dot at the surface of a hydrogel sample. (E) AFM mechanical phase data taken simultaneously with the data in (D). AFM phase data is sensitive to a number of surface properties (hardness, adhesion, etc.) and is often difficult to interpret. In this case, we simply note that the AFM phase contrast observed in (E) allows for easy distinction between areas of the hydrogel (high AFM phase) and the carbon dot surface (low AFM phase). (F): s-SNOM phase data taken simultaneously with the data in (D), with incident illumination at 1490 cm−1. The s-SNOM data was demodulated at the 3rd harmonic of the AFM tapping frequency to reduce the influence of background effects. The hydrogel and the carbon dot particle have different optical responses under the incident illumination, and so s-SNOM phase contrast is observed between the different regions of the AFM scan. Corresponding s-SNOM amplitude data is shown in Fig. S22 of the ESI.†

*Dominika Krok, Wiktoria Tomal, Alexander J. Knight, Alexander I. Tartakovskii, Nicholas T. H. Farr, Wiktor Kasprzyk and Joanna Ortyl
Highly efficient carbon dot-based photoinitiating systems for 3D-VAT printing
Polymer Chemistry, 2023, 14, 4429-4444
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D3PY00726J

The article “Highly efficient carbon dot-based photoinitiating systems for 3D-VAT printing” by Dominika Krok, Wiktoria Tomal, Alexander J. Knight, Alexander I. Tartakovskii, Nicholas T. H. Farr, Wiktor Kasprzyk and Joanna Ortyl is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third-party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/.

Active self-assembly of piezoelectric biomolecular films via synergistic nanoconfinement and in-situ poling

Piezoelectric biomaterials have attracted great attention owing to the recent recognition of the impact of piezoelectricity on biological systems and their potential applications in implantable sensors, actuators, and energy harvesters. However, their practical use is hindered by the weak piezoelectric effect caused by the random polarization of biomaterials and the challenges of large-scale alignment of domains.*

In the article “Active self-assembly of piezoelectric biomolecular films via synergistic nanoconfinement and in-situ poling” Zhuomin Zhang, Xuemu Li, Zehua Peng, Xiaodong Yan, Shiyuan Liu, Ying Hong, Yao Shan, Xiaote Xu, Lihan Jin, Bingren Liu, Xinyu Zhang, Yu Chai, Shujun Zhang, Alex K.-Y. Jen and Zhengbao Yang present an active self-assembly strategy to tailor piezoelectric biomaterial thin films.*

The nanoconfinement-induced homogeneous nucleation overcomes the interfacial dependency and allows the electric field applied in-situ to align crystal grains across the entire film. The β-glycine films exhibit an enhanced piezoelectric strain coefficient of 11.2 pm V−1 and an exceptional piezoelectric voltage coefficient of 252 × 10−3 Vm N−1. Of particular significance is that the nanoconfinement effect greatly improves the thermostability before melting (192 °C). *

This finding offers a generally applicable strategy for constructing high-performance large-sized piezoelectric bio-organic materials for biological and medical microdevices.*

The piezoelectric properties of the as-prepared β-glycine nanocrystalline films were evaluated by piezoresponse force microscopy (PFM) measurements.*

For all piezoresponse force microscopy (PFM) measurements and SKPM (scanning Kelvin probe force microscopy) measurements mentioned in this article, conductive NanoWorld Arrow-EFM AFM probes with PtIr coating on both AFM cantilever and AFM tip were used. The nominal resonance frequency and the nominal stiffness of the AFM probe are 75 kHz and 2.8 N m−1, respectively.

Figure 3 from “Active self-assembly of piezoelectric biomolecular films via synergistic nanoconfinement and in-situ poling” by Zhuomin Zhang et al.:PFM measurements and polarization alignment studies of β-glycine nanocrystalline films. a The PFM OOP amplitude mapping overlaid on the 3D topography of as-prepared films in a 1.5 × 1.5 µm2 area. The applied AC voltage is 2 V. b The corresponding PFM OOP phase mapping overlaid on the 3D topography. c Histogram calculated from the PFM OOP phase mapping in (b) showing that the β-glycine nanocrystalline films are dominated by domains with the unique polarization direction. d PFM OOP phase mapping of the β-glycine microcrystals obtained by electrohydrodynamic focusing deposition through heterogeneous nucleation. e Histogram calculated from the phase mapping in (d). f Comparison of statistics of the piezoelectric phase for the as-prepared β-glycine nanocrystalline films via synergistic nanoconfinement and in-situ poling (left), and β-glycine microcrystals grown by heterogeneous nucleation in the absence of nanoconfinement effect (right). NanoWorld conductive Arrow-EFM AFM probes were used for the piezoresponse force microscopy (PFM) and scanning Kelvin probe force microscopy (SKPFM) measurements mentioned in this article. — Figure 3 from “Active self-assembly of piezoelectric biomolecular films via synergistic nanoconfinement and in-situ poling” by Zhuomin Zhang et al.:
PFM measurements and polarization alignment studies of β-glycine nanocrystalline films.
a The PFM OOP amplitude mapping overlaid on the 3D topography of as-prepared films in a 1.5 × 1.5 µm2 area. The applied AC voltage is 2 V. b The corresponding PFM OOP phase mapping overlaid on the 3D topography. c Histogram calculated from the PFM OOP phase mapping in (b) showing that the β-glycine nanocrystalline films are dominated by domains with the unique polarization direction. d PFM OOP phase mapping of the β-glycine microcrystals obtained by electrohydrodynamic focusing deposition through heterogeneous nucleation. e Histogram calculated from the phase mapping in (d). f Comparison of statistics of the piezoelectric phase for the as-prepared β-glycine nanocrystalline films via synergistic nanoconfinement and in-situ poling (left), and β-glycine microcrystals grown by heterogeneous nucleation in the absence of nanoconfinement effect (right).

*Zhuomin Zhang, Xuemu Li, Zehua Peng, Xiaodong Yan, Shiyuan Liu, Ying Hong, Yao Shan, Xiaote Xu, Lihan Jin, Bingren Liu, Xinyu Zhang, Yu Chai, Shujun Zhang, Alex K.-Y. Jen and Zhengbao Yang
Active self-assembly of piezoelectric biomolecular films via synergistic nanoconfinement and in-situ poling
Nature Communications volume 14, Article number: 4094 (2023)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-39692-y

Please follow this external link to read the full article: https://rdcu.be/dzddh

The article “Active self-assembly of piezoelectric biomolecular films via synergistic nanoconfinement and in-situ poling” by Zhuomin Zhang, Xuemu Li, Zehua Peng, Xiaodong Yan, Shiyuan Liu, Ying Hong, Yao Shan, Xiaote Xu, Lihan Jin, Bingren Liu, Xinyu Zhang, Yu Chai, Shujun Zhang, Alex K.-Y. Jen and Zhengbao Yang is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third-party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Cross-sectional Kelvin probe force microscopy on III–V epitaxial multilayer stacks: challenges and perspectives

The development of photovoltaic (PV) technologies has progressed significantly over the past twenty years as a result of considerable advancements in solar cell device engineering and material science. *

As a consequence, solar cells have turned into complex structures containing numerous layers and interfaces. The capability to conduct local investigations at the nanoscale level that provide information on the electrical properties of materials and along physical interfaces is becoming crucial for solar photovoltaic device efficiency improvement. *

The capability to conduct local investigations at the nanoscale level that provide information on the electrical properties of materials and along physical interfaces is becoming crucial for solar photovoltaic device efficiency improvement. *

Multilayer III–V-based solar cells are complex devices consisting of many layers and interfaces. *

The study and the comprehension of the mechanisms that take place at the interfaces is crucial for efficiency improvement. *

Electrical measurements based on scanning probe microscopy (SPM) allow for the analysis of two-dimensional (2D) features at the surface and along a physical cross section of nanoscale semiconductor structures. *

Among the wide variety of SPM techniques available, Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM) is an application of the atomic force microscope (AFM) for the evaluation of the surface potential with nanometric resolution. KPFM is a valuable investigative approach for the study of work functions via the measurement of the contact potential difference VCPD, that is, the difference between the electrostatic potential at the surface of the investigated structure and that of the KPFM probe. *

In the article “Cross-sectional Kelvin probe force microscopy on III–V epitaxial multilayer stacks: challenges and perspectives” Mattia da Lisca, José Alvarez, James P. Connolly, Nicolas Vaissiere, Karim Mekhazni, Jean Decobert and Jean-Paul Kleider apply frequency-modulated Kelvin probe force microscopy (FM-KPFM) under ambient conditions to investigate the capability of this technique for the analysis of an InP/GaInAs(P) multilayer stack. *

KPFM reveals a strong dependence on the local doping concentration, allowing for the detection of the surface potential of layers with a resolution as low as 20 nm. *

The analysis of the surface potential allowed for the identification of space charge regions and, thus, the presence of several junctions along the stack. Furthermore, a contrast enhancement in the surface potential image was observed when KPFM was performed under illumination, which is analysed in terms of the reduction of surface band bending induced by surface defects by photogenerated carrier distributions. The analysis of the KPFM data was assisted by means of theoretical modelling simulating the energy bands profile and KPFM measurements. *

KPFM was performed using a scanning probe microscopy system under ambient conditions and operated in the frequency-modulated KPFM (FM-KPFM) mode using a two-pass scanning mode, where the second pass was performed at a constant distance of 10 nm from the sample surface. *

The FM-KPFM mode was chosen over the amplitude-modulation mode (AM-KPFM) since it is well known that it provides better spatial resolution. In particular, in AM-KPFM the electrical force between the tip and the sample is directly evaluated, whereas in FM-KPFM the gradient of the force is analysed. As a result, FM-KPFM is more sensitive to local tip apex–sample surface interactions; therefore, long-range electrostatic interactions of the cantilever are reduced, as well as the effect of parasitic capacitances. Additionally, in FM-KPFM, surface potential measurements are less dependent on the lift-height tip–sample distance than in AM-KPFM since this mode is less sensitive to static offsets induced by capacitive coupling or crosstalk. *

The laser beam deflection system in the author’s AFM employs a laser wavelength of 1310 nm, which is well below the bandgap of the sample; therefore, the parasitic laser absorption, which may interfere with the KPFM measurement, is reduced to negligible levels. Highly doped NanoWorld n+-Si ARROW-EFM tips (typical AFM tip radius < 25 nm) with a conductive Pt/Ir coating at a typical resonance frequency of 75 kHz were used. *

Figure 4 from “Cross-sectional Kelvin probe force microscopy on III–V epitaxial multilayer stacks: challenges and perspectives” by Mattia da Lisca et al :
KPFM measurement under ambient conditions on the surface cross section of the sample under illumination: (a) topography and (b) VCPD image. A vertical coloured bar is included to ease the identification of the different layers. The profile in (c) corresponds to the region identified by the dotted white segments in (b), each point of the profile (vertical) direction being an average of 207 points over a width of 0.7 μm along the x axis. Several regions along the structure have been highlighted using different colours (see text). The black arrow indicates the space charge region at the InP:nid/InP:Zn interface.

*Mattia da Lisca, José Alvarez, James P. Connolly, Nicolas Vaissiere, Karim Mekhazni, Jean Decobert and Jean-Paul Kleider
Cross-sectional Kelvin probe force microscopy on III–V epitaxial multilayer stacks: challenges and perspectives
Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology 2023, 14, 725–737
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.14.59

The article “Cross-sectional Kelvin probe force microscopy on III–V epitaxial multilayer stacks: challenges and perspectives” by Mattia da Lisca, José Alvarez, James P. Connolly, Nicolas Vaissiere, Karim Mekhazni, Jean Decobert and Jean-Paul Kleider is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third-party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.