{"id":1672,"date":"2020-04-09T12:22:35","date_gmt":"2020-04-09T11:22:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.nanoworld.com\/blog\/?p=1672"},"modified":"2023-04-18T12:59:23","modified_gmt":"2023-04-18T11:59:23","slug":"kpfm-surface-photovoltage-measurement-and-numerical-simulation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.nanoworld.com\/blog\/kpfm-surface-photovoltage-measurement-and-numerical-simulation\/","title":{"rendered":"KPFM surface photovoltage measurement and numerical simulation"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Kelvin\nProbe Force Microscopy ( KPFM ) is a scanning probe microscopy technique. It is\na combination of the Kelvin probe and of Atomic Force Microscopy methods. The\ntechnique consists in evaluating the difference in work function between two\nconducting materials, by using a nanometer scale tip ( the \u201cKPFMtip\u201d), and placing\nit close to the material to be characterised, where a difference in work\nfunction leads to an electrostatic force developing between the two, which is\ntranslated as an oscillation of the tip\u2019s cantilever. A bia sapplied via an\nexternal circuit is varied until the force and hence the electrostatic field\nbetween sample and KPFM tip is cancelled.*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In the\narticle \u201c<em>KPFM surface photovoltage measurement and numerical simulation<\/em>\u201d\nCl\u00e9ment Marchat, James P. Connolly, Jean-Paul Kleider, Jos\u00e9 Alvarez, Lejo J.\nKoduvelikulathu and Jean Baptiste Puel present a method for the analysis of\nKelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM) characterization of semiconductor devices.<br>\nIt enables evaluation of the influence of defective surface layers. The model\nis validated by analysing experimental KPFM measurements on crystalline silicon\nsamples of contact potential difference (VCPD) in the dark and under\nillumination, and hence the surface photovoltage (SPV). It is shown that the\nmodel phenomenologically explains the observed KPFM measurements. It reproduces\nthe magnitude of SPV characterization as a function of incident light power in\nterms of a defect density assuming Gaussian defect distribution in the\nsemiconductor bandgap. This allows an estimation of defect densities in surface\nlayers of semiconductors and therefore increased exploitation of KPFM data.*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The KPFM measurements were performed using NanoWorld <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" aria-label=\"ARROW-EFM (opens in a new tab)\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nanoworld.com\/electrostatic-force-microscopy-afm-tip-arrow-efm\" target=\"_blank\">ARROW-EFM<\/a> conductive AFM tips with a PtIr coating.<br> The tip work function didn\u2019t require calibration because only SPV measurement were performed and studied. Measurements were performed in the KPFM amplitude modulation (AM)mode rather than the frequency modulation (FM) one. The AM mode was chosen because lateral resolution was not a problem on the homogeneous bulk samples studied, allowing focus on the superior surface potential resolution that can be achieved with the AM mode.*<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1119\" height=\"724\" src=\"https:\/\/dhipgo7nn2tea.cloudfront.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/09115440\/figure-1-from-KPFM-surface-photovoltage-measurement-and-numerical-simulation-by-Cl%C3%A9ment-Marchat-et-al.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1676\" srcset=\"https:\/\/dhipgo7nn2tea.cloudfront.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/09115440\/figure-1-from-KPFM-surface-photovoltage-measurement-and-numerical-simulation-by-Cl%C3%A9ment-Marchat-et-al.jpg 1119w, https:\/\/dhipgo7nn2tea.cloudfront.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/09115440\/figure-1-from-KPFM-surface-photovoltage-measurement-and-numerical-simulation-by-Cl%C3%A9ment-Marchat-et-al-300x194.jpg 300w, https:\/\/dhipgo7nn2tea.cloudfront.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/09115440\/figure-1-from-KPFM-surface-photovoltage-measurement-and-numerical-simulation-by-Cl%C3%A9ment-Marchat-et-al-1024x663.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/dhipgo7nn2tea.cloudfront.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/09115440\/figure-1-from-KPFM-surface-photovoltage-measurement-and-numerical-simulation-by-Cl%C3%A9ment-Marchat-et-al-768x497.jpg 768w, https:\/\/dhipgo7nn2tea.cloudfront.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/09115440\/figure-1-from-KPFM-surface-photovoltage-measurement-and-numerical-simulation-by-Cl%C3%A9ment-Marchat-et-al-974x630.jpg 974w, https:\/\/dhipgo7nn2tea.cloudfront.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/09115440\/figure-1-from-KPFM-surface-photovoltage-measurement-and-numerical-simulation-by-Cl%C3%A9ment-Marchat-et-al-1200x776.jpg 1200w, https:\/\/dhipgo7nn2tea.cloudfront.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/09115440\/figure-1-from-KPFM-surface-photovoltage-measurement-and-numerical-simulation-by-Cl%C3%A9ment-Marchat-et-al-800x518.jpg 800w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1119px) 100vw, 1119px\" \/><figcaption>  Fig. 1 from \u201c<em>KPFM surface photovoltage measurement and numerical simulation<\/em>\u201d by Cl\u00e9ment Marchat et al:<br> Kelvin probe force microscopy setup schematic. The conducting cantilever carrying the KPFM tip is scanned over a surface while AC + DC potential is applied. The AC signal is a sinusoid whose frequency matches the mechanical resonance of the cantilever. The four-quadrant detector provides feedback in order to minimise cantilever oscillation by varying the DC signal thereby yielding the sample work function compared to the tip one. <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>*Cl\u00e9ment Marchat, James P. Connolly, Jean-Paul Kleider, Jos\u00e9 Alvarez, Lejo J. Koduvelikulathu and Jean Baptiste Puel<br> <strong>KPFM surface photovoltage measurement and numerical simulation<\/strong><br> EPJ Photovoltaics10, 3 (2019)<br> DOI: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1051\/epjpv\/2019002<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Please follow this external link to read the full article: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.epj-pv.org\/articles\/epjpv\/abs\/2019\/01\/pv180014\/pv180014.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" aria-label=\"https:\/\/www.epj-pv.org\/articles\/epjpv\/abs\/2019\/01\/pv180014\/pv180014.html  (opens in a new tab)\">https:\/\/www.epj-pv.org\/articles\/epjpv\/abs\/2019\/01\/pv180014\/pv180014.html <\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Open Access The article \u201c<em>KPFM surface photovoltage measurement and numerical simulation<\/em> \u201c by Cl\u00e9ment Marchat, James P. Connolly, Jean-Paul Kleider, Jos\u00e9 Alvarez, Lejo J. Koduvelikulathu and Jean Baptiste Puel is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article\u2019s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article\u2019s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kelvin Probe Force Microscopy ( KPFM ) is a scanning probe microscopy technique. It is a combination of the Kelvin probe and of Atomic Force Microscopy methods. The technique consists in evaluating the difference in work function between two conducting materials, by using a nanometer scale tip ( the \u201cKPFMtip\u201d), and placing it close to &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nanoworld.com\/blog\/kpfm-surface-photovoltage-measurement-and-numerical-simulation\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\" >KPFM surface photovoltage measurement and numerical simulation<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[62,66,65,228,140,17,340,339,342,341,338,336,334,335,331,110,241,229,332,337,333,343,240],"class_list":{"0":"post-1672","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"hentry","6":"category-news","7":"tag-afm-probes","8":"tag-afm","11":"tag-arrow-efm","12":"tag-atomic-force-microscopy","13":"tag-kelvin-probe-force-microscopy","14":"tag-kpfm","15":"tag-kpfm-probe","16":"tag-kpfm-tip","17":"tag-modeling-and-band-bending","18":"tag-opto-electronic-device-characterization","19":"tag-photovoltaic-solar-cells","20":"tag-photovoltaics","21":"tag-semiconductors","22":"tag-solar-cell","23":"tag-spm","25":"tag-spv","26":"tag-surface-defects","27":"tag-surface-photovoltage","28":"tag-343","29":"tag-240"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nanoworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1672","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nanoworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nanoworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nanoworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nanoworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1672"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/www.nanoworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1672\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1679,"href":"https:\/\/www.nanoworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1672\/revisions\/1679"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nanoworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1672"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nanoworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1672"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nanoworld.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1672"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}